You're understating your disagreement about nature. While I emphasize nature's monstrousness to explain our existential situation, I don't say the wilderness is wholly negative. Nature is sublime, awesome, and supremely creative as well as being obviously inhuman in its scale and amorality. Indeed, I argue for cosmicist pantheism.
I can see how an archaic revival might be said to "save" us, at least for some time. After all, we survived as hunter-gatherers in the wilderness for millions of years. But that would be evolutionary salvation, which means our species would eventually go extinct.