May 3, 2023
You're mistaking me for the garden variety, scientistic secular humanist. Instead, I'm an old school existential atheist. I've argued that the proofs for and against God are irrelevant because the choice between theism and atheism is essentially existential, ethical, aesthetic, or "faith-based." It's a question of character, such as whether we want to belong to some social group, or how we manage our dread of death.
I've also critiqued modern secular culture, including the concept of social progress, and the modern Promethean, Faustian, Luciferian ethos. And I agree that science doesn't explain all mysteries. Specifically, I've argued that science can't explain the rise of the property of naturalness.
