You’re contradicting yourself in saying that God’s the transcendental condition of being and a person. That is, you’re trying to reconcile the mystical, abstract, classical theistic conception of God with the naïve, literalistic, folk one. The former is only nominally theistic since it’s consistent with the atheistic denial that there’s a supernatural person who created the universe and performs miracles to direct human history, while the latter conception is preposterous in the modern context.