Yes, there's a mystery in the world. Quantum mechanics, the Big Bang, etc. So the universe is ambiguous, isn't it? Lots of interpretations can be supported by the ambiguous evidence. Therefore, it's not so easy or automatic to find God by investigating nature. Therefore your earlier comment which I quoted was an oversimplification.

What I just did there was to write a series of logically connected sentences. Do you see how that argument differs in kind from your rambling salesman rants? Do you see now the weakness in your earlier comment about finding God by investigating nature?

Of course, you were just speaking hyperbolically, going with the preacher's flow. It was an inspired train-of-thought, as you might like to think of it. I've been known to rant too, especially when I've had too much beer. But I understand the difference between a rant or a screed and an argument. I'm not sure you do.