Yeah, but when scientific types like Bertrand Russell, Lawrence Krauss, and Sean Carroll speak of brute natural facts, that's just rank scientism, as in an anti-philosophical prejudice. The implication is that knowledge ends where scientific objectifications stop, leaving no room for philosophical conjectures. Alas, scientism is philosophical, so that prejudice amounts to a performative self-contradiction, as has long been established in the history of Western philosophy.

https://medium.com/grim-tidings/the-miraculous-brute-fact-of-the-natural-order-3f877baa2c1a?sk=b4b9a733954d5e0b4ffc9cf4b2917515