Would say that heuristics, rules of thumb, or intuitions are "computations" or trials and errors (or "assumptions from observations")? If it's the former, I wonder whether "computation" is being stretched too thin. There are whole ontologies built up around "information," according to which information is deeper than physicality.

I take a neo-Kantian, pragmatic view of knowledge, which I've written about below. The question for me is whether there's such a thing as purely objective knowledge, or whether that's oxymoronic.

https://medium.com/original-philosophy/how-understanding-the-facts-makes-all-knowledge-partly-subjective-bda98e29f990?sk=387e9e50b01927fbaae66014e5ed731a

https://medium.com/original-philosophy/why-we-should-reject-the-conceit-of-objective-truth-c3b3195a883c?sk=f2cefc17e62b7737e31c4523775fc9ed

https://medium.com/the-apeiron-blog/what-is-the-nature-of-ultimate-knowledge-664642cf8147?sk=73f128be23b11ea1e09a8c3e83db51ed