Well, you're not really addressing the issue at hand. But you say that the world is "eager for the expression of your compassion." I don't see how that follows from basic Buddhism's empiricist naturalism. You seem to be incorporating later developments of Buddhism whereas I'm critiquing only the oldest, basic Buddhist principles.

The question I'm raising isn't about life after death, but about whether we should expect morality or altruism from enlightened Buddhists. You say positive or negative attitudes are relative, and we can bring them with us as we die. Fine, but is the universe at large biased towards one or the other, or is the cosmos neutral towards our self-serving or anthropocentric evaluations?

If Buddhism is to remain a naturalistic philosophical practice, I think the Buddhist must say that the universal conditions not just for life but for the evolution of all physical constructs are neutral towards our preference for compassion, joy, tranquility, and so on. That means that the uplifting portrait of enlightenment is itself an unenlightened one since it presupposes the egoistic or humanistic bias towards morality.