Weak sauce, dude. My "box"/ perspective isn't so little. It encompasses black holes; quantum entanglement; the vastness of the universe; the anomaly of how our artificial, technological worlds impose meaning on the monstrous wilderness; the secrets of philosophy; and the absurdity of unworthy, obsolete religions.

I reject theistic religions, especially those whose souls have been sold to the worst of modernity, as is the case with conservative Christianity. I understand the Nietzschean problem that modernity might be unsustainable without a viable, atheistic substitute for a religion in the Durkheimian, Tillichian sense. Religion would be an organization that holds society together based on a shared faith in something that's held to be sacred or of ultimate importance. The question is whether anything's sacred after the death of God.

So my perspective encompasses all of that.

Can you think outside the Bible or your parochial, childlike theistic conceit of a patriarchal deity? Do you really want to compare the range of our perspectives? Where are all your multifaceted writings, the records of your far-ranging thoughts? Your Medium comments seem pretty repetitive to me.