There's a difference, though, between intentions and the effects of your preferred policies. You can intend to be a champion for freedom, especially in the negative sense of freedom as being the lack of coercion. But then you can support policies that unintentionally limit freedom in the positive sense (the freedom to fulfill your potential). That's the problem with libertarianism, as I explain in other articles, such as the ones below.

https://medium.com/discourse/the-conservative-misunderstanding-of-liberty-66140c60429c?sk=6cb489ceb6a31002fc8e8f46b64a6397

https://medium.com/discourse/a-critique-of-libertarian-self-ownership-a36f26f3c82f?sk=368fb2bf1a42b903376899490e154f40

https://medium.com/discourse/the-sophistry-of-ayn-rands-case-for-ethical-selfishness-3f901f3f64f6?sk=62dc8a7b5284eeadf3d43a388417e2cc

https://medium.com/discourse/phony-humanism-and-ayn-rands-libertarian-mythos-b3c9b4eb515f?sk=edac1e388ca6734f9933f218832f4767

https://aninjusticemag.com/the-arbitrariness-of-george-wills-conservatism-2f0976bfa717?sk=e8d5a48692061b05638f19c1b55674d9