That's the pot calling the kettle black, with respect to the ad hominem charge. The weight of my case is found in my articles which have nothing to do with you, your tone, or any ad hominem attack. I've answered your criticisms at great length in these comments and even indirectly in the articles, and I haven't deliberately ignored any of your points. On the contrary, I gave you around 20 links to support one of my contentions, which you'd earlier found lacking, and you still weren't satisfied. So I'm afraid there's no pleasing you, which means you're hardly a neutral arbiter here.

In any case, how about we adjourn for now until my next anti-economics article comes out within a couple of weeks, assuming you'd be inclined to criticize it too?