That's not really fair, though, since I've addressed Buddhism and Daoism, and combined Western humanism with pantheism (a more Eastern outlook). Moreover, I don't just adopt the moralistic concept of good and evil, but reconstruct morality in aesthetic terms that are more compatible with naturalism.

Castle in the air? My philosophy is supposed to be grounded in science (naturalism). That's not air.

And who says I've made criticisms of wokeness a "core issue"? Maybe one percent of my articles is about left-wing political correctness. On the contrary, most of my political articles criticize conservatism.

But I agree that we should broaden our perspectives and not be so narrowminded in our Western or moralistic biases. That's what I attempt to do with my philosophical writing.