That's just hot air, though. Indeed, I was talking about sociological factors, not just spouting the theological creed. I don't think the creed speaks to Christianity's existential role in the twenty-first century. The creed is a shibboleth, as I explain elsewhere (link below), a test of faith. Have you read Orwell's book 1984? Are you familiar with the scene in which Big Brother insists that Winston tell a lie about how many fingers he's holding up, to demonstrate his commitment to the regime? The more absurd the test, the greater the show of loyalty needed to overcome your intellectual integrity.

So yeah, according to the Christian creed, what's most important is Jesus as the incarnation of God who sacrificed himself for divine love and mercy. But I wasn't writing Christian theology. I was thinking of the religion in existential terms. Calling that philosophical context an "error" is just hot air. Not everyone needs to talk about Christianity as if they were Christians. We can see things from different perspectives.