That's a quibble, though. The general idea in monotheism is that since there's only one deity, and he's perfect, all the bad stuff in life and the universe must be blamed on something else, on an underling gone wrong, such as a fallen angel. "Entropy" and "disorder" here mean all the stuff that seems imperfect, such as our mortality (the reality of death), and by extension the end of all things in nature. Disorder would amount to the apparent unfairness, randomness, and pointlessness of many events.

That absurdity, though, is rather the very face of God. The more inhuman some event is, the more we must leave our comforting lifeworld to appreciate it, which is humbling.

My point is that this existential realization is truer to the spirit of religion than is the exoteric game of arguing about the myths of God's intentions. All of that's too anthropocentric to be honourable and coherent even in religious terms.

Yes, James 2:19 hints at this point, although you've sort of misquoted it. The point there is about belief in God's oneness, that there's one God that transcends all other beings. All mere religious beliefs, though, are supposed to be empty without religious deeds. Demons may have the same religious beliefs as a human, but those beliefs are obviously insufficient since demonic deeds are bad. That is, demons would apply their religious beliefs badly.

None of that matters, though, when we dispense with the theistic personifications. On the contrary, if nature is divine (being obviously the supreme creative power), nature's equipped us with the capacities for Luciferian progress. We call this "civilization," the transformation of nature with artifacts. Monotheists have only been demonizing these progressive humanistic impulses.