That's a pompous way of saying you'd have like to read something else.

Did I say my critique is perfectly original? I set out in this article to show that Holland's influential case in Dominion is flawed, and that's what I did.

Weber said Protestantism influenced capitalism in various respects, but Holland goes much further than that, which is why Christian apologists and pessimistic atheists use his case against secular humanism.

You seem to be a Marxist. I wouldn't deny that economies impact cultures, but that's not to say I'd reduce "ideologies" to material forces in that crude way.