That's a lot of info. There's an academic analysis followed by a kind of personal confession or autobiography. Maybe focusing on parts of your theory or story, such as on what it was like growing up in that Church would clarify your message.

Regarding the theoretical "overview," it's important to distinguish between stipulation and explanation. If this is meant to be a genuine explanation, it has to be testable. You say there's some evidence for it in the form of "micro-biome research publications."

It's just that defining things in a way that make sense to us could produce a sort of conceptual sandbox. We likely all have such reassuring concepts and assumptions that help us process our experience. The question is why others should want to play in our sandbox. What reasons are offered to convince others that their sandbox/worldview is flawed and that they could learn a thing or two from ours?

How, for example, would your worldview fare against a rival one? What criticisms of your assumptions can you answer? What are some arguments in support of your worldview? Are you even trying to argue that we should regard the Now as special or are you just stipulating that we should, arguing, as it were, by a series of bald assertions?

Maybe some follow-up articles could be more argumentative and comparative.