Thanks. You might be thinking of "objective" in honourific terms. I've written a lot on how I think of objectivity. I think of it as the result of objectification, the viewing of things as being independent of our personal and social biases, but not of the pragmatic grounding of our species. Objectivity isn't, then, the same as neutrality. We reduce fragments of nature to slaves that can be potentially exploited or mastered. That's what an object is, a natural fragment that's potentially enslaved. Objectivity works in that the fragments are indeed subject to being used, at least temporarily and illusorily, although nature (the broader wilderness) will likely have the last laugh.

It might have been better to say that "God" is the name of the unknowable. A label can be arbitrarily attached to anything, but the label doesn't mean we've understood the thing.