Sure, but I think you're missing my point. You're saying there's nothing subjective about something like the scientific means of detecting exoplanets, or of any similar "result" of measurement.

But calculations can work in the total absence of understanding of what's being calculated. That's the status of quantum mechanics, for example. Nor are raw data or the abundance of information that computers can calculate the same as knowledge or wisdom.

Subjectivity enters the picture when we try to understand what we're observing or measuring, when we attempt to conceptualize the nature, for instance, of planets. What are they, ultimately? That conception will be partly subjective because it will reflect our choice of simplifications, and our humanistic, evidently rather Luciferian agenda to usurp nature's mojo, to control our environment for our deification.