Such laughable nonsense you've been reduced to. This refusal to admit defeat will stand you in good stead as a pseudoscientific economist and propagandist for capitalism. You sound like a theologian tearing down science with canards and God-of-the-gaps arguments to make room for the respectability of religion.
Here's what a species is in biology:
"A biological species is a group of organisms that can reproduce with one another in nature and produce fertile offspring. Species are characterized by the fact that they are reproductively isolated from other groups, which means that the organisms in one species are incapable of reproducing with organisms in another species. The term species can also be defined as the most basic category in the system of taxonomy. Taxonomy is a scientific system that classifies organisms into categories based on their biological characteristics. Species can also be defined based on a shared evolutionary history and ancestry. This method of defining species is called phylogenetics, which is the study of the evolutionary relationships among organisms. The evolutionary process by which a new species comes into being is called speciation."
Now what's the comparable account of economies in economics that all economists agree on? How can economists not have a working idea of what economies in general are? What are you running from in hiding the the nature of the consensus? It's very suspicious, what you're doing.
