Right, some of my writings are more academic and impractical than others. That's bound to happen in philosophy. This article just analyzes this famous question that amounts to a koan, a conceptual puzzle. But I don't view any of my articles as standing by themselves. It's one big body of work I'm producing here, so the question is about the practical implications of the whole.

I should also say that while we should incorporate science in dealing with these big questions, the questions are largely philosophical.