Nope, I'm not going to waste time trying to prove that to you. I've seen many debates on the subject, and inerrantists are trained to explain away even the most obvious contradictions by twisting themselves into pretzels and positing the most ludicrous scenarios. The problem is epistemological, not just the data. Inerrantists are propagandists rather than critical truth seekers. I've no evidence that you're objective about this or trained enough in critical thinking to be able to understand why the inerrantist's handling of the contradictions is flawed.

You can find plenty of lists of contradictions online. Bart Ehrman presents some, for instance:

https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/dr-bart-ehrman-lists-many-inconsistencies-in-the-new-testament/