No, I don't think so, as long as the dualism is at a higher level of analysis that doesn't violate the idea that everything's divine. We'd be divine, too, as part of nature. But although everything would be divine, everything wouldn't be one or entirely unified, at least not on some level of analysis or emergence. So there would be a multiplicity in nature, including the difference between life and nonlife, and between artificiality and the wilderness.

Our divine function might be to convert the latter into the former, so the divine universe would be self-transforming by using intelligent life as a pivot point. And you'd need dualism to explain that process (what lies on either side of the pivot).