My epistemology is pragmatic. Naturalistic knowledge is tentative. The so-called necessity of knowledge in metaphysics, theology, or even mathematics is phony or cheap since it's stipulative, making those discourses largely fictive.

https://medium.com/original-philosophy/how-understanding-the-facts-makes-all-knowledge-partly-subjective-bda98e29f990?sk=387e9e50b01927fbaae66014e5ed731a

https://medium.com/the-apeiron-blog/saturated-in-fiction-consensus-reality-as-a-web-of-stories-485d6e00f7e7?source=friends_link&sk=a398071fd9f19826fcae2157f85d4474

https://medium.com/grim-tidings/deflating-the-miracle-of-maths-effectiveness-84d689ead936?sk=1adb81a14a2e5fe566b30b4925363a97

https://medium.com/grim-tidings/mathematicians-as-magicians-the-trick-behind-their-pompous-formalities-8cc62a80bffc?sk=a8795f76e9291334b18bad60eb995306

https://theapeiron.co.uk/mathematics-an-intimidating-game-fb39f141ceae?sk=3018776311dd2323277262efef36e3cb