Just more name-calling (fool, pig, self-righteous, ignorant, pseudo-intellectual) and arguments by assertion from you. Your attempt to save face because you’re afraid to debate the merits of your religion bores me.

Where’s the contradiction in an atheist pointing to the hypocrisy and incoherence of a religion or of a Christian society that claims to follow Jesus while betraying his stated values at every turn?

Moreover, where’s the contradiction in an atheist agreeing with some of Jesus’s values while rejecting the Christian deification of him?

You allege that my writings are rife with delusions, but those are empty words from you. Arguments by assertion can be dismissed out of hand as if they hadn’t been made. So why make them in the first place unless your purpose is just to save face?

Given that a defense of Christianity must fail because the religion is a preposterous embarrassment, you’re supposed to at least entertain the critics, not bore them. That’s your aesthetic obligation as someone who’s doing his best while he’s beholden to an archaic mindset. I’m not angry with you, then, so much as disappointed by the insolence of your comments.