I've never said I have all the answers. I write about what I know the best (philosophy and religion), and I write with a forceful tone to help prevent the signal from succumbing to noise.

Also, if you read through enough of my worldview, you find that the answers I provide are self-effacing. My view of truth is pragmatic and aesthetic. In the areas of philosophy and religion, we're just telling stories, not producing absolute truths. I take my philosophy to be mainly a story. It's a story that's meant to be consistent with our most objective theories from science, which are not just stories. But when looking for meaning in the objective facts, the most we can do is be gripped by a powerful narrative.