It's weird that several readers are interpreting this article in that way, as a veiled argument for theistic religion. Sure, I criticize liberalism here, but that's a far cry from implicitly defending archaic religions. Indeed, that's a false dichotomy.

As my many other writings indicate, I'm an atheist, but I address this Nietzschean challenge faced by late-modern secular cultures, by laying out an overall mission in life that combines existentialism, pantheistic naturalism, and neo-Kantian pragmatism, with a dash of transhumanism.