I'm sorry I don't have time to respond in detail to your long comment. But I think I understand what you're saying. You're saying we should be more openminded and not so quick to prioritize. Moreover, you're saying the world itself is openminded, as it were, in that it doesn't prioritize or develop absolute, fixed hierarchies. Zero stands for the unknown and for open-mindedness.

If that's what you're saying, it's a little like Hegel's metaphysics except that he sees the historical dialectic as purpose-driven and teleological, so there is indeed a final, perfect "One" to which all change is leading.

The open-endedness of your system is why it reminded me of mysticism. Mystics are also open-minded in that they don't trust in the adequacy of logical thought. They trust direct experience, not our descriptions or mental models.

My view takes on board HP Lovecraft's "cosmicist" view of nature, which is likewise open-minded about the ultimate status of the universe, to make room for humility and for horror as signs of enlightenment. Once we dispense with the anthropocentric religions, we should think of even our best conceptions as relatively small-minded, compared to what super-intelligent aliens might think.