I'll look into those sources. On the surface, Hazony seems to be a tribal nationalist, meaning his "conservatism" would take us back to prehistory rather than just to the medieval period. His emphasis on social hierarchies likewise would amount to the social Darwinism that I've said is essential to a conservatism that differs from liberal humanism.

The notion that I'm hiding or strawmanning anything is silly. Which policy of Project 2025 have I misrepresented by quoting Forbes' summaries? The question would be whether you can debate without fallaciously resorting to personal attacks and red herrings.