Ignoring the strawmen, arguments by assertion, and ad hominem strewn throughout your comments, the sticking point is, as I said, the difference between our primary sources of information.

My sources are philosophy and science, yours are the Bible and what you call an experience of God (or of the Holy Spirit which tells you how to interpret God's words). That epistemic difference is bound to take us in different directions.

I believe Manichaeism was focused on preserving light, and it equated that with enlightenment. But let me guess, you're also not a Manichaean dualist. You're not one for labels.