I would prefer to keep discussions in the comments focused, so I have more time to write articles.

What I'd say here is that you seem to be saying we have a tendency to reify or to entertain the possibility that abstractions exist. You use numbers to explain what's going on here, which might be more confusing than clarifying. But I agree that we understand things by dividing them up with our concepts. The scientific method is analytical in that scientists break up systems into their parts, using models to see how the parts work under different conditions.

What you say about matter emerging from infinite space seems similar to what cosmologists say about an initial state of symmetry that was mysteriously lost and that enabled a universe to develop. Gnostics said much the same thing in mythical terms: the Godhead suffered from a collapse or a Fall, when Wisdom or Sophia decided to go her own way, forgetting her identity as a function of the Godhead. Everything follows in her footsteps.

I'm just not sure what the upshot is of your structural analysis. It sounds potentially mystical, as in you'd give more priority to unity than to the apparent independence of phenomena.

We can leave it here for now, if you like, and pick it up down the road.