I wasn't talking about all your comments, just that last round of them which was overtly and tediously personal.

I'd rather not go into the argument here again since I've written that article on neoclassical economics and it's three times as long as my average Medium articles. So we can save it until you read that case of mine, if you're interested.

But the reckoning that should have happened is obviously the dethronement of the neoclassical approach. If that hasn't happened, it's because those models are unfalsifiable and therefore more theological and dogmatic than scientific.

Certainly, I'm not familiar with the ins and outs of the mathematical models, and I doubt I could follow them without a lot more background study. The very same could be said about the nitty-gritty of Christian casuistry, Catholic theology, and the like. As I said, you can formalize any model (or set of generalizations), including theological ones. That doesn't make them scientific. They have to be based on empirical observations and they need to make testable predictions.