I was just explaining what you evidently didn't understand, the logic of the article's argument. I was dispelling your fallacious objections.

And there's no reason to dignify your presumptuous question with a direct answer. It's like asking, "When will you be a good person?" It's ad hominem, it's presumptuous beyond belief, and it's backed up, in your case, only by confusions about the article.

The "self" in question, for you, isn't really a self either. It's the impersonal, reified structure of consciousness.