I take your point about fractals, and they'd be interesting for pantheistic purposes too. I say more about the profundity of space and time in the first article below, though.

It's standard to say that aesthetics is wholly subjective. I argue otherwise in the articles below the first one. Certainly, there's a subjective element in cultural tastes, but when it comes to the reaction to objectified nature, I think certain evaluations are more reasonable and existentially comprehensive than others.

https://medium.com/grim-tidings/the-terrors-of-outer-space-and-deep-time-220e8eec42ab?sk=b467e483d7b718f6b67ef595714845f5

https://medium.com/grim-tidings/the-inherent-value-of-a-godless-universe-980314a44fd8?sk=48b94f7149c68a39653ffa52e533e973

https://medium.com/grim-tidings/natures-creativity-proves-the-downfall-of-nihilism-7a3fa219ac3f?sk=07276055ea9ca3f3f339c6cc076d104b

https://medium.com/grim-tidings/the-spell-that-nature-keeps-casting-even-for-scientists-3a4f4342ec35?sk=69e88b7b1b013adb4e5bde5dfc1eb4f6

https://medium.com/grim-tidings/scientific-nihilism-and-the-resurrection-of-morality-ccafead01b97?sk=d6e1bb2a126f124346529581d96a3ba6