I don't think most physicists would argue that because most don't delve into the philosophical interpretations of quantum mechanics. They just use the equations to get the measurements. Most physicists don't subscribe to the Copenhagen interpretation, or if they do, that still leaves the question of how to interpret the measuring device in the measurement problem. Does the "act of observation" entail a conscious observer (and thus the subjectivity of what's observed) or could decoherence from the environment do the trick?

Notice also that quantum weirdness is quite consistent with what I'm saying in this article, that science re-enchants nature.