I didn't invent the term "folk psychology." It's been part of philosophy since at least the 1980s, when I was a child.
I think you mean to distinguish science from scientists. I'm aware there's such a difference. How does that impact my argument in favour of "folk" or commonsense psychology and against eliminativism?
I'm not even clear from your comment which side you take on that issue. But your request that I change the article so it might be worthy of being read by you comes off as rude, although I assume there might be a language barrier here.