I agree that we're part of nature, metaphysically and physically speaking. But there's also an existential division between (1) the wilderness and (2) mentality and its artificial extensions. Recognition of that division is what gives rise to Vervaeke's meaning crisis.

I'm not sure quite what you're saying towards the end of that comment. It sounds like you're encouraging me to act as a guru, to try to compete with Vervaeke on those dubious grounds. Would leading folks make me happy, even if that were likely to happen? Not necessarily. There are introverts and extroverts, for example. Some folks are born leaders or followers, while others are born outsiders.