I agree. Foster isn't an obnoxious Christian. On the contrary, he's explicitly opposed to the most obnoxious aspects of that religion. So I'd agree with him there.

But he still provides cover for what I regard as the world's worst major religion. He defends Christianity against secularism and atheism, and he does so with arguments that are pitifully weak.

Also, where have I attacked Dan Foster personally? I've attacked his articles--indeed, just two that are directed at atheists--and his arguments. I don't say that Foster is feeble. I say his ten arguments are.