Defending Thomistic psychology isn't the same as defending Christian theism. I think consciousness is an emergent property, and I've criticized psychiatry in other writings. But I've argued at length that exoteric theism is quite irrational. Then again, I've also argued on existential grounds that the foundations of our worldviews aren't so rational, so whether theistic claims can be rationally justified isn't so crucial to me. Rather, we should judge religions and worldviews largely according to their aesthetic value and their ethical implications. Some religions may fare better than others when those standards are in view. Personally, I'd prefer a less archaic religion than the usual theistic suspects, such as a pantheistic religion that's closer to science.