Are you saying this interpretation of mine is just a model of the chaos? Yours would be too then, so where would that leave us?

Sure, we model the universe to understand it. So my point would be that as best as we can understand the universe, from a philosophically naturalistic perspective, nature's overall impression on us is horrific. Nature is monstrous, given our misplaced, alienated social intuitions. The universe fluctuates, coalesces, and reaches equilibrium, as you say--and all of that universal evolution happens pointlessly, with no intelligent guidance. The universe seems animated just like a numinous zombie. That's the stuff of a horror show.

I don't see how your cosmology is inconsistent with what I'm saying here. We're just emphasizing different aspects of naturalism. You're emphasizing the physicality, while I'm emphasizing the existential upshot.